Newt Gingrich, Formerly of the Conservative Movement

As most of you probably already know, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, formerly of the conservative movement, has teamed up with the current Speaker of the House to promote the global warming hoax with this clever commercial.

Our “conservative” friends at Terra Rossa alerted me to this responsive post by Whit Ayers.

 I couldn’t agree more with Newt’s position here. I’m a conservative, but I’m also a passionate environmentalist. And it dismays me to see that, somewhere along the way, conservatives wrote themselves out of the environmental debate. I don’t question the motives of my liberal environmentalist friends, but I do question their methods. And I genuinely believe conservatives have something to say on this issue. As a reader recently wrote on this site, conservation is inherently conservative.

Whit, it’s like this. We do believe in a clean environment. We just don’t believe that we humans are destroying the planet. We don’t believe in man made global warming. Show us how to conserve energy, which also helps us to save money. But please stop buying into this man made global warming hoax and trying to convince us of this idiocy. You and Newt and all the rest, are nothing but tools for a bunch of radical leftists posing as environmentalists.

21 comments:

  1. William, 24. April 2008, 13:02

    Right, we can’t have tools running the gov’t.

     
  2. Jeffraham Prestonian, 24. April 2008, 14:56

    One of these days, Glen or someone brighter will explain in detail how Evil Liberals stand to profit from pulling this “elaborate hoax” on the entire world. Until then, I’ll just shake my head, and say, “Well, that’s wingnuts for ya!” It’s like the underpants gnomes — OBVIOUSLY it’s a LIBERAL PLOT, but that middle part is just a shrug… then, profit! :lol:
    .

     
  3. Mickey, 24. April 2008, 15:53

    Mr. Dean, I agree with you and you are right, expcept the part about Newt ever being a conservative.

     
  4. clark, 24. April 2008, 17:29

    You should expand on this “hoax” theory sometime and explain how you, Sen. Inhofe and Rush Limbaugh are right; while me, Bill McKibben, James Hansen and the NASA Goddard institute are wrong. Is the opening of the Northwest Passage a hoax, for example?
    And what about other problems? Did you know that there is a huge dead zone in the Gulf of Mexico? Have you heard that the Salmon season in Northern California was canceled because of a massive collapse in the numbers of that fish? Massive dieoffs of honey bees? Does any of this ring a bell?
    Maybe I pay too much attention to the Liberal Media, but it sounds like we have serious environmental problems even if global warming is a “hoax.”

     
  5. William, 24. April 2008, 18:06

    Newt used his brain, therefore he is not a conservative.

     
  6. Serr8d, 24. April 2008, 18:19

    I left a comment on Newt’s blog (one of the many ‘anonymous’ comments) last night.

    By Anonymous @ Wednesday, April 23, 2008 8:30 PM

    Al Gore left the stage in 2000 a broken, angry, and spiteful man, having lost his bid for the Presidency because he couldn’t carry Tennessee, his home state. He was elected here twice as a US Senator (I voted for him then, twice) but then the Clintons had him; he took a hard left turn, and was nearly unrecognizable to his former supporters. Thus the solid defeat at home in 2000.

    Did Al learn anything from his defeat? Yes, bitterness.

    I believe Al has latched on to this pursuit of Global Warmalism as a sort of surrogate Presidency, and he’ll doggedly persist in ‘winning’ until he has everything his way. He doesn’t want to lose another one, not now, after winning the Nobel Prize. That’s not enough, now.

    Unfortunately for Al, science can’t be silenced; eventually we will know more about our ever-changing climate. There’s so many conflicting reports both going both ways, even some new “Ice Age” predictions, that to have Big Al say early on that “the debate is OVER” should have finished his ride as Global Warmalism’s spokesman. If the scientific community hadn’t been so cowed.

    Really, with Al Gore leading this movement, there’s no way Conservatives can ever have a voice. Because of 2000. Mark these words…Al Gore won’t allow any Conservative input into ‘his’ movement. It’s personal, now.

    From glancing at comments today, maybe only one person agrees with him.

     
  7. William, 24. April 2008, 19:38

    Wow, can’t you seperate Gore derrangement syndrom from the issue? Guess not!
    If I were Newt, I would have deleated the comment after reading the first words “Al Gore”

    So, this global warming religion Gore started as a reaction to the bitterness of losing the presidency?

    All please note. Serr8d is full of shit.

    Al Gore has long been aware of Global Warming and environmental issues and held some of the first congressional hearings on the subject in the late 1970’s

    Are we surprised Gore couldn’t carry TN, a state of Dumbfuckistan? NO
    Are we surprised that the Supreme Court handed Bush the Presidency? NO
    Are we suprised Gore won the persidential vote for president? NO
    Are we surprised Serr8d is fixated on Gore because he knows this fact as well as Gore’s success since he won the presidential vote? NO

     
  8. Mickey, 24. April 2008, 19:54

    I remember now, Gore went to Hollywood, not Cal-Tech

    Hey these guys are pretty smart:

    S. Fred Singer
    President, Science and Environmental Policy Project
    Distinguished Research Professor, George Mason University
    Professor Emeritus of Environmental Science, University of Virginia
    Princeton-trained physicist

    Frederick Seitz
    President Emeritus, Rockefeller University
    Past President, National Academy of Sciences
    Past President, American Physical Society
    Chairman, Science and Environmental Policy
    Project

     
  9. Mickey, 24. April 2008, 19:57

    According to the official 2001 Statistics of the Presidential and Congressional Election of November 7, 2000, George W. Bush beat Al Gore in Florida by 543 votes.

    And Newt is a CFR member.

     
  10. William, 24. April 2008, 20:35

    Frederick Seitz directed the spending of over $45,000,000. of RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company medical research money. No health problems associated with tobacco were ever discovered by Seitz’s research teams — he paid labs very well for their “research.”

     
  11. William, 24. April 2008, 20:38

    I’m glad you mentioned Seitz and Singer, they are perfect role models for the global warming denialists as they are possibly the most corrupt scientists who’ve ever lived.

     
  12. Serr8d, 24. April 2008, 20:40

    Al Gore is the face of Global Warmalism. It’s only natural to associate Al Gore with his own religion. He expects that.

    Global Warmalism is Al Gore. The first is recurrent, natural, cyclic climate change; the other, a liberal doofus with not enough sense to know how to pour piss out of a boot.

    But he can sure find more just like him to carry his water.

     
  13. William, 24. April 2008, 21:49

    Personally, I think data is the face of global warming.

    If you need a face, maybe now you can induct Newt.

     
  14. Doc, 24. April 2008, 22:02

    Yes, Willy. Like the data you conveniently ignore.

    Hypocrite.

     
  15. William, 24. April 2008, 23:45

    Behold … a scientist/educator that believes in the supernatural. Careful Mikey.

     
  16. Doc, 25. April 2008, 6:14

    That’s it? That’s your informed response on your failure to refute data on the connection between Global Warming and the El Nino/La Nina cycle? I used that data to completely blow you out of the water, so you’re now saying, “ooooh— Christian scientist boogeyman!” It’s typical of your debate style– all ad hominem and no substance.

    I’ve got an idea. Since you’ve got that nice cushy job playing guitar for a living, how about you use those free credits the university offers you and pursue a chemistry or physics degree. Then you might be able to hold up in a scientific debate.

     
  17. William, 25. April 2008, 8:59

    Thanks mikey, funny you should say that. I was a chemistry major til I came to my senses, boring.

     
  18. Doc, 25. April 2008, 10:31

    Given the way you approach science, I think your move to music was more out of necessity than choice….

     
  19. William Yelverton, 25. April 2008, 13:10

    Oh yea, lots of jobs for classical guitarists out there …. lol

    Given the way you approach science, I think you’d have done better as a White House appointed EPA administrator.

     
  20. serr8d, 25. April 2008, 19:14

    William, in case you run out of strings to pluck, there’s other jobs fitting your skillset

     
  21. Cooking classes spring texas. (Trackback), 3. August 2008, 0:42
     

    Group cooking classes houston….

    Cooking classes northern va. Cooking classes in boston. Cooking classes with hotels in seattle. Viking cooking classes. Vegatarian cooking classes. Cooking classes toronto….

     

Write a comment: