Bush: McClelland “handled his assignment with class, integrity. He really represents the best…”

Yes, it seems that President George W. Bush was correct. Scott McClellan has integrity.

Scott McClellan is an American hero whose expose’ on the Bush administration - What Happened: Inside the Bush White House and Washington’s Culture of Deception - soared to #1 on the Amazon Best Seller list yesterday.

Now they are turning on him in typical Republican swiftboat fashion. When the guy finally comes out and reports that he had been spewing lies fed to him, the same guy who is lauded for his integrity, then becomes a ‘traitor’ in the land of Bushco. Bushco has used words to describe McClellan’s book like ‘total crap’… ‘not the Scott we knew’… ‘disgruntled’ and ‘puzzled.’ Suddenly, the guy Bush called “the best” is now “total crap.”

The most popular attack against McClellan is, “why didn’t he speak up at the time?” Yea right!! You would expect McClellan to speak up during a time in the Bush Administration when anyone who wasn’t a Bush ‘true believer’ was quickly ‘retired?’ (i.e. Gen. Shinseki and Colin Powell, Richard Clarke, etc…). Also, obviously McClellan was lied to, don’t these idiots get it? Obviously he didn’t know enough of the total picture at the time to betray his job of defending his boss.

Instead of considering what McClellan is saying might bear some kernel of truth, Bushco focuses on his ‘disloyalty.’ They have the balls to suggest that these were not McClellan’s words and that he’s saying these things just to sell books. What a disgusting bunch of crooks and liars. How could anyone at this point disparage themselves enough to participate in the swiftboating of McClellan and the support of a failed, corrupt, and lying administration? Actually, most Bushies are wisely keeping their mouths shut and ignoring this at this point, but … there are actually such authoritarians out there.

Here the most despicable examples I could find, and I couldn’t find many. These are the most revolting delusional individuals on the planet outside of the White House. Links to what they wrote below:

Webutante : “It helps to remember that McClellan was fired by the White House in 2006. He must be hard up for attention or money. Probably both. ”

Mark Levin: “I’m all for profit, but not when the price is betrayal — which is what I and several others smell here.”

Investors Business Daily : “this book is little more than a settling of scores by McClellan, who quite obviously felt abused by the White House.”

Doc at the Autopsy: “He certainly knows how to sell a book. Throw out an unsubstantiated bomb like that, and watch as the liberals run out and snatch up the book.”

7 comments:

  1. glendean, 29. May 2008, 5:22

    William, do you think it is possible to post on anything other than Bush, McCain, and your disdain for Christianity?

    I have an idea. Post on something positive. Maybe tell us how good of a candidate Barack Obama is. Maybe you can tell us how atheism has provided you with so much peace and serenity.

    It’s like you are obsessed with George Bush. Do you dream about him? Do you spank the ole monkey to visions of his head bouncing off of a guillotine? Dude, you are a nut.

     
  2. Cameron Clark, 29. May 2008, 7:41

    hero- a man of distinguished courage or ability, admired for his brave deeds and noble qualities.

    I don’t necessarily disbelieve McClelland, but calling him a “hero” because he landed a six figure book deal to talk about what he saw is over-the-top. People using that word to describe McClelland in this situation are cheapening the word.

    This man is a hero. Scott McClelland is practicing careerism.

     
  3. MichaelnotMike, 29. May 2008, 11:55

    “Now they are turning on him in typical Republican swiftboat fashion.” You mean they’re telling the truth about him?

    “You would expect McClellan to speak up during a time in the Bush Administration when anyone who wasn’t a Bush ‘true believer’ was quickly ‘retired?’” Wouldn’t that be acting with integrity?

     
  4. glendean, 29. May 2008, 12:19

    Good to see you back again, Michael.

     
  5. Number 9, 29. May 2008, 16:28

    William, do you think it is possible to post on anything other than Bush, McCain, and your disdain for Christianity?

    Thank you Glen.

    William, is it possible?

     
  6. MichaelnotMike, 29. May 2008, 16:57

    Thanks, Glen. Now I’ve got to get back to posting.

     
  7. ftxu iekt, 20. June 2008, 11:18

    tpkqmx dvxjnyqit clkfumzo zscxtnv hvqcf vuiofql gnzerupqa

     

Write a comment: