So How Far Will Enviro-Nuts Go?

by Nathan McIntyre, on AnAmericanFrontPorch.com

Contrary to common belief, white, conservative, gun owning men can love the environment.We continue to be it’s chief stewards.

You’ve probably heard recently about the “lost Amazon tribe” found in South America. Well, turns out it was all a hoax. This “lost tribe” has been not-so-lost since 1910, and the whole escapade was a poorly carried out plan by the environmental lobby to end logging. This episode normally wouldn’t have made it to my fingers had I not just finished the monumental novel “State of Fear” by Michael Crichton.  Let me tell ya folks, the last two chapters are a book in and of themselves.

Without giving much away, Crichton tackles the sticky ground crossed when political agendas and science collide…in his book to deadly results. While fictional, it raises some issues only exaggerated by these enviro-nutjobs willing to do anything to prove their point.

Including making their point up entirely.

There is no doubt that we need to take care of our planet. It’s the responsible thing to do. However, how far can the emotion-driven environMENTAL lobby go before we’ll all say “enough” and draw our line? Sure right now it’s simply making up a lost tribe. Could they be making up larger “coming catastrophes?”

While legislating pseudo-science from their 10,000 square foot private cities on a hill we the people will be taxed and robbed of basic freedoms, all because of politicians in bed with what I consider domestic terrorists. We must protect the environment, but not from life itself. The environment without life is well, dead.

Think about it. Read the book.

5 comments:

  1. Number9, 3. July 2008, 14:13

    Is that the same hoax William went hook, line, and sinker for?

     
  2. Anonymous, 3. July 2008, 21:31

    you mean Willam Yelverton, guitar hero?

     
  3. William, 3. July 2008, 22:18

    Yes, Glen… it is I

     
  4. Serr8d, 4. July 2008, 8:29

    While a catalytic converter reduces the smog-producing chemicals coming out of a car’s tailpipe, it also results in greater gas consumption per mile along with increased emissions of carbon dioxide. In the process of dealing with one problem - urban smog - we’ve increased our impact on Earth’s atmosphere and climate.

    Those, and the blended fuels, cost more than they are worth

    Legally and politically, it has proven difficult to end or even reduce the proliferation of clean fuel requirements. But it is worthwhile to try, because these costly specialized blends have done little to clean the air, and will do even less in the years to come.

     
  5. Serr8d, 4. July 2008, 8:34

Write a comment: