Tennesseefree.com
Tennessee News and Politics

Tennesseefree.com

DAILY KOS commentors trash Tony Snow (did we expect anything different, given that they are ‘Progressives’ ?)

July 12th, 2008 . by Serr8d


Jeff Goldstein alerts us to the not-so-hidden inner thoughts of the people who drive the engine of progressivism, by way of comments posted on that wonderful island of tolerance and compassion, the award-winning and much-celebrated Daily KOS.

Jeff compiled quite a list of comments celebrating the unfortunate death of Tony Snow. Tony died yesterday, of colon cancer. A compassionate human KOS diarist (not so many of those) posted a tribute to Tony, but other ‘Progressives’ were quick to spout their true feelings.

Just a quick sample, a few KOS comments on that tribute thread. Many more at Protein Wisdom


THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS FROM DAILY KOS

HIs death sucks? (0+ / 0-)

If only his cancer was contagious and the thugs he worked for caught it, it would have saved the suffering of actual innocent people. He was part of the mafia that took over this country and frankly, I’m glad he’s dead.

It is indeed hard to lose a loved one. But I can’t even muster any good thoughts to send his family and friends.

Here is a man who could of used his power and talents to help people, to better the world. And he didn’t — in fact he did the complete opposite. He was a liar, we all know what the consequences of those lies have been and will continue to be until God knows when.

I am not sad he’s gone. Sorry if that’s offensive to anyone. I’ll save my sorrow for those who suffered because of the lies Mr. Snow pertetuated.

There is a certain irony in him being killed by his own rotten ass.

Snow was a shit head piece of FOX NEWS lying crap. He and the rest of BushCo need to be jailed.

That anyone here would dare praise him is beyond an insult to Progressive Democrats like me.

UNREAL!

F**k Tony Snow, early & often (3+ / 3-)

He’s in the deepest corner of Hell right now, bent over next to Joe Goebbels, with Satan’s forked dick way up in his rotten cancerous colon.


Enough of that.Since Jeff’s post, KOS pulled the plug on this diarist, but not before this exposure. Jeff’s given permission to disseminate his post, so here are his thoughts…

” Make no mistake. These are people whose self-proclaimed compassion extends only to those who agree with them — or at least have manners enough to pretend to — and this includes a willingness to turn en masse on one of their own, as the Kos diarist responsible for trying to cast Snow in a more “human” light is finding out today.

“The rest of us are their mortal enemies, and our deaths are to be celebrated, and even embroidered with colorful fantasies about finding ourselves deep in hell, where we’ll be eternally cornholed by the forked cock of Satan.

“To vote these people into power by way of their representative proxies is to ensure that we move more and more toward a totalitarian society in which “hate speech” comes to mean anything not sanctioned by those who legislate themselves into the position of moral arbitrators.

“All I want to do is tend my garden. But if it comes down to it, I’ll use my weed whacker to defend the perimeter.

“Bet on it.”

Not so much left to say, but RIP Tony Snow, and condolences to your family.

You progressives, it’s time for some meditation. Because those KOS comments are yours, and your mindset. Whether you admit it or not.

Own it.


crossed from home


60 Responses to “DAILY KOS commentors trash Tony Snow (did we expect anything different, given that they are ‘Progressives’ ?)”

  1. comment number 1 by: Shimmy

    Why does Tony Snow walk to the podium if all he can speak is thin, sniping clatter? Let’s presume Tony Snow is mathematically imprudent. If so, then we must then determine whether his tongue is sweet and breezy, like a furnace, or just dainty.

    Satisfaction no longer comes from Tony Snow. It is now sought in Rush Limbaugh’s accusation that Tony Snow’s cancer was announced for the White House’s political gain. Announced for Tony Snow’s value as a commodity.

  2. comment number 2 by: Brian

    http://thinkprogress.org/2008/07/12/tony-snow-has-died/

    There’s a good one too. For liberals, that’s just good old fashioned whacking material.

    Place a drop cloth on your keyboard, W.

  3. comment number 3 by: Jeffraham Prestonian

    BREAKING: TONY SNOW DENIES HE IS DEAD. PERINO REFERS ALL QUERIES TO ST. PETER.
    .

  4. comment number 4 by: Serr8d

    Shimmy, you’re pretty shitty. As in a shithead.

    Move along, then.

  5. comment number 5 by: Jeffraham Prestonian

    BREAKING: BUSH: “I WELCOME THE CHANCE TO DEBATE THE POSSIBLE BUT UNLIKELY PASSING OF TONY SNOW AFTER THE 2008 ELECTIONS.” MORE TO COME.
    .

  6. comment number 6 by: Jeffraham Prestonian

    BREAKING: DANA PERINO SAYS “SNOW NOT DEAD; MERELY RESTING.”

  7. comment number 7 by: Jeffraham Prestonian

    BREAKING: SCOTT McCLELLAN SAYS “PERINO IS A WORLD CLASS ASS-KISSER AND TOTAL LYING TWAT.” FILM AT 11:00.

  8. comment number 8 by: Jeffraham Prestonian

    BREAKING: RET. GEN. TOMMY FRANKS SAYS “DOUG FEITH NOW 2ND STUPIDEST GUY ON FUCKING EARTH.” DEVELOPING…

  9. comment number 9 by: kick ass

    And who came up with fucked up nonsense that progressivism is about some rainbow and bunny “compassion and tolerance”.

    We’re here to kick ass and take names, but we don’t really care what your name is.

  10. comment number 10 by: Jeffraham Prestonian

    And who came up with fucked up nonsense that progressivism is about some rainbow and bunny “compassion and tolerance”.

    Idiots. Mouthbreathing-knuckledraggers. Tennessee Kool-aid drinkers. The GOP base, in TN.

    That’s who. Plain, simple.
    .


  11. [...] ‘luminaries’ know of your site’s contempt and lack of respect for the recently dead? Of the Daily Hate spewed from the less [...]

  12. comment number 12 by: CaptainBrainstorm

    BREAKING: LIberal moron beats dead horse.

  13. comment number 13 by: Anonymous

    Breaking: JP still bi-polar

  14. comment number 14 by: Serr8d

    BREAKING: LITTER BOXES UNATTENDED! THE ACRID, SOUR SMELL OF CAT’S ASS PERMEATES WEST NASHVILLE COMPARTMENT COMPLEX!

    (This message brought to you by Jeffraham Prestonian.)

  15. comment number 15 by: HBK

    For real, “progressivism” does not claim to be about “compassion” or “tolerance”.

    It’s about standing up for justice and human rights, and not just when it’s convenient, i.e., in our “national interests” to do so.

  16. comment number 16 by: Serr8d

    “For real, “progressivism” does not claim to be about “compassion” or “tolerance”. ”

    Thus speaks the moral relativist, ROR. If the means suit the end, then whatever necessary. Including pissing on a corpse.

    And, it seems, ‘progressivism’ includes this sort of assholic behavior. Kos commentors were more sympathetic to Saddam Hussein than to Tony Snow, fer chrissake. Would progg mothers approve?

  17. comment number 17 by: HBK

    Well, I certainly don’t subscribe to the notion that a person automatically deserves respect because they happen to be deceased. A sonofabitch is a sonofabitch, living or dead. That doesn’t make me a moral relativist. However, I really don’t know if Tony Snow was a sonofabitch or not. If not, your criticisms are arguably legitimate.

    But that’s actually beside the point. The point that impugning “progressivism” itself because some people claiming to be progressives exhibit characteristics that may be deemed “intolerant” or “uncompassionate” is non sequitur.

  18. comment number 18 by: HBK

    Serr8d:

    To be more specific, there is no hypocrisy, as your post implies, because “progressivism” makes no claim to be inherently and necessarily tolerant or compassionate. For example, a progressive is not going to assume an obligation to “tolerate” ID, or feel “compassion” for a racist sonofabitch, simply predicated on “progressivism”. If you believe that qualifies these people as “assholes” you are of course entitled to that opinion.

  19. comment number 19 by: Brian

    I felt the same way about Steve Gilliard. You have this worthless fucking piece of shit and then people start lionizing him because he ate himself into an early grave.

    I mean, when you all die I’m going to laugh. Fuck you people. Die now.

  20. comment number 20 by: HBK

    Well, I certainly didn’t condone wishing ill on people merely because they happen to be political opponents.

  21. comment number 21 by: serr8d

    The comments at PW are up to over 400 now.

    This one, from Jeff, seems to convey the reasons thinking sorts oppose this sort of boorish behavior…

    #

    Comment by Jeff G. on 7/12 @ 9:16 pm #

    As long as we’re speaking honestly, though (well, some of us), I’ll give you some psychological insight. The comment that got me and that prompted me to put up this post was the one about how his family deserved to suffer — that they “earned their grief” and that somebody should picket the funeral.

    I thought of what the family must be going through, and how they might feel in the future when they see people expressing that kind of sentiment. And it made my blood boil, quite frankly.

    Scott can pretend that, among progressives, these people are just a small and vocal internet minority. But I don’t believe it for a second. When the political is the personal, it follows, from their worldview, that those who are enemies to their politics are enemies to their person.

    And so it is hardly surprising that they cheer the death of their enemies. I think it a bug. They seem to think it a feature.

    Which is what totalitarians do.

    And I’m glad I pointed it out before it, like much else that doesn’t depict “progressives” as the caring nurturers they pretend to be, was airbrushed out of history. Scott, for whatever reason, seems particularly proud of his funeral analogy. I happen to find it ridiculous.

    Therein lies the discrepancy.

    It’s about the surviving family, really.

    There’s times that it’s just not right to further a political agenda. I submit that those times include the very day a person dies, or the days before the funeral.

    When Jesse Helms died, there was this same sort of stuff, but no one really questioned that. After all, he was 80-something, and well past retirement. But Tony, now, 53, that’s still young; and with three kids: 10, 11, and 14.

    There’s absolutely no reason for the Kos commenter’s behavior. Or similar behavior by ‘progressives’ on dozens of sister sites.

    I question their very humanity.

  22. comment number 22 by: Bob Is Right

    you assholes on this thing called KOS are sick. you call yourselves “progressive”, but I believe you have “regressed” back to the times of the cave men. with all the vile scumbags on the left - and there are many - I don’t wish them dead. the sad thing is I can’t even wish them “smart” - they remain perpetually ignorant.

  23. comment number 23 by: JTF

    hey asshole, would you feel sorry for saddam’s press secretary? how about hitler’s or pol pot’s? these war criminals are no different than bush, tony snow was an enabler, a fox news propagandist pure and simple, he was point man in delivering lies to america. unlike mcclellan, snow did not have balls or integrity to reveal the lies. sad for his kids, they deserved better.

  24. comment number 24 by: Serr8d

    Yes, asshole JTF, I would feel sorry for Saddam’s press secretary’s kids. If he had any.

    Maybe, like you, he was gay and didn’t have kids.

  25. comment number 25 by: JefFredham Phelpsonian

    Tony Snow became Press Secretary in 2006. Well into the War Against Innocent Iraqi Civilians that McBushyburton elected to send our nation’s voluntary, mercenary babykillers to steal THE OIL!!11@1!11

    I hope hell has a chemotherapy wing. Good point JTF. REpigletcans are just nazis and Khmer Rouge agents. All except for being good communists like me and you.

    Fuck ‘em! Am I right??? Am I right? Scott McClellan is a national hero. We should celebrate the sperm in his sock. Drink up my friend. Drink up.

  26. comment number 26 by: William

    Whats the matter Serrd8? You don’t like people who are different from you, do you? I’ll bet all your friends are white Christians, just like you. You jealous that I have a great life, great women, and don’t have the burden of kids and responsibility like you? Must mean I’m gay, that’s the only explanation. Sorry your life sucks.

  27. comment number 27 by: CaptainBrainstorm

    hey asshole, would you feel sorry for saddam’s press secretary? how about hitler’s or pol pot’s?

    Bush = Hitler. Welcome to Godwin. And complete lunacy.

    You don’t like people who are different from you, do you?

    Like conservatives. We all know how you feel about my family, William, and your secret desire that harm come to them.

  28. comment number 28 by: William

    The captn’s paranoia runs deep.

  29. comment number 29 by: CaptainBrainstorm

    Not paranoia. I explained why I wanted you to remove my personal info. Instead of doing the gentlemanly thing, you acknowledged there was risk, and then refused to remove it, which simply means you want someone to do me or my family harm.

    William, the Internet Stalker.

  30. comment number 30 by: William

    bs, there is no risk
    everyone here knows who I am
    am I worried?

    heh

  31. comment number 31 by: Jeffraham Prestonian

    bs, there is no risk
    everyone here knows who I am
    am I worried?

    I have to agree with the assholes on this one, William.

    For one thing, they may have mouthed off a lot more than you have, and people may be hunting them from long ago. The Internet makes that task a lot simpler to connect otherwise disperate and diluted dots.

    Personally-identifiable info? No, man. Not cool.
    .

  32. comment number 32 by: Serr8d

    Damn.

    Point for JP.

    Jeeze, man, having sensible, lucid moments like this one, and the earlier Heller comment…couple drops in a very large 55-gallon drum, but still.

    Laudable.

  33. comment number 33 by: William

    when impersonating a colleague, an outing is in order.

  34. comment number 34 by: HBK

    As far as moral contemptibility goes a few crass words at a sensitive time pales in comparison to supporting a government that indiscriminately tortures innocent people to death in the name of an illegal war of conquest waged under blatantly false pretenses and claims that it is lawful to do so.

    This rises above the level of merely advancing a “political agenda”.
    I would say the outrage is justified for the most part.

  35. comment number 35 by: Anonymous

    Hey William, if there is nothing to worry about, what say you give us your home address and phone number?

  36. comment number 36 by: William

    Glen, you know my name, look up da number…

  37. comment number 37 by: CaptainBrainstorm

    I never impersonated the colleague, dumbass. You first revealed him to be me on your blog. I attempted to correct you, but you wouldn’t listen. When you corrected it (providing a big splash of me and my info on your front page, btw), you never removed his info from your blog, either.

    And I’m not concerned about you posing a threat, William. I’m concerned about other deranged progressives reading your blog, getting into a lather, and seeking me or my family out.

    I will also point out that you haven’t done this with any other poster on your blog, which just means you are using this as an intimidation method– something internet stalkers do.

  38. comment number 38 by: Anonymous

    did we get that one right?

    Nope, Anon.

    Not on my watch.

    Serr8d

  39. comment number 39 by: Captain Brainstorm

    And for similar reasons I mentioned above, we shouldn’t be posting William’s personal info online either.

    Just because one of us here is a childish twit doesn’t mean the rest of us have to behave in a similar fashion.

  40. comment number 40 by: 2231RileyRoad

    you’re right, we shouldnt sink to his level

  41. comment number 41 by: William

    I attempted to correct you, but you wouldn’t listen.

    1) wrong, you perpetuated the misidentification and the person who I misidentified helped identify you, with the help of your Univ IT people.

    When you corrected it (providing a big splash of me and my info on your front page, btw), you never removed his info from your blog, either.

    2) false, his last name no longer appears on my blog posts, if you find it, let me know and I will remove it.

    All of this is explained here

    My name, number and address are posted above, (thanks Glen). I’m not a coward I stand behind what I say and I take responsibility for it.

  42. comment number 42 by: William

    This is childish and paranoid. If I was an asshole, I tell you.

  43. comment number 43 by: Jeffraham Prestonian

    What is this? An asshole contest?
    .

  44. comment number 44 by: Captain Brainstorm

    you perpetuated the misidentification

    I’ve explained it before, William. In each of those cases of “perpetuation” (Read: you didn’t correct me completely making a fool of myself, you authoritarian Nazi!), I said statements that were complete accurate in pertaining to me. You were too happy to mock someone follicly-challenged and attack someone based upon appearance (because I destroyed you in every one of your idiotic posts on your blog).

    false, his last name no longer appears on my blog posts

    Not on the blog posts, no. But it’s there still because you’re such a lazy douche. I’ve cached the page so I can refer to it over and over again what a liar you are. I forgot about this gem from me, where I break down who the real authoritarian is. Highly recommended reading for anyone here.

    My name, number and address are posted above

    But that’s just it, genius. YOU didn’t post the info– someone else did. That’s stalking. If you want to take an absurd amount of responsibility for your opinions by posting your address and phone number, then go ahead.

    By the by, Internet Stalker William, YOU never put your personal information up on your blog– but you did post my personal info. Again, I’m the only person you bestowed this honor to, which adds credence to my insistence that you did this as a method to intimidate me. There’s no other reason to post it. Your “taking responsibility” meme is completely without merit.

    By saying this is “taking responsibility”, what you’re essentially saying is “you should take responsibility for my actions, especially if someone hurts you or your family– that’s YOUR fault, Doc, not mine”. It’s calling someone out, William. If you can’t defend your intellectual stances, then don’t get online and post them. But by posting my personal information online, all you are doing is inviting some unhinged freak to take potshots at me or my family.

    If you want to live “balls to the wall” and post your personal information online, then do it yourself. Posting other people’s info online is completely cowardly and intellectual vapid.

    If you don’t remove the info, I can only assume you truly wish harm upon my beautiful 2- and 3-year old children and my lovely wife, as well as myself. I’ve asked repeatedly, and from conversations with you on this, I think you’ve crossed several boundaries of valid intellectual exchange into veiled threats.

    If you don’t wish me or my family harm, William, take down the information. If you do wish us harm, leave it up.

  45. comment number 45 by: Captain Brainstorm

    By the by, I’m going to ask Glen to remove your personal info from this post as it adds a level of responsibility to him as moderator of the blog.

    If you want to post your info on here, William, do it yourself.

  46. comment number 46 by: William

    Considering I live in dumbfuckistan, gun owners heaven, put posts up about hanging Bush… considering you’re in the back woods of WI, are on the side on the gun nuts… who do you think might be more at rish of taking responsibility for what they say?

  47. comment number 47 by: William

    Although I will say, it’s good to be on the usually correct side. Being in an environment of educators, free thinkers and relatively enlightened people, based on your views, I think you’re more worried about tenure Mikey, not your daughters.

  48. comment number 48 by: Captain Brainstorm

    I think you’re more worried about tenure Mikey, not your daughters.

    Aha, and now we see why you posted my info. You want to get me fired.

    Mature to the last, William. Can’t hold up an intellectual debate, so you have to try some other way to bring down your opponent.

    And I notice you didn’t remove anything from your posts, so you still want harm to come to my kids. Classy. A perfect stalker. Wishing someone or someone’s family harm one way or another William is pretty crappy. But actually taking actions to make it happen– well, then, that’s just plain illegal.

    As you like to say, erm, “Game Over”.

  49. comment number 49 by: William

    Being a Bush authoritarian, aren’t you used to living in fear?

  50. comment number 50 by: William

    Captn, I have removed your last name from my blog.
    I really would not want any harm to come to you or anyone else. I don’t understand your fear except for the fact that you are an authoritarian with an unpopular and illogical extremist view, and I do realize that the basis of your authoritarianism is based on fear …. unreasonable fear. That is common with those who fear people different from themselves. I hope this makes you feel better.

    peace

  51. comment number 51 by: CaptainBrainstorm

    Thank you, William, for seeing the light.

    Maybe one day, if you have a family of your own, you’ll understand what lengths you’ll go to to protect them, and what careful measures you’ll take to secure them from harm.

    Call me a creature of “fear”, fine. Get your last word in. Just so long as my family isn’t put in jeopardy from childish antics.

  52. comment number 52 by: nedwilliams

    I really would not want any harm to come to you or anyone else.
    peace

    Could of fooled me. William, couldn’t you just admit you were wrong or at least just remove his personal information without trying to get some petty digs in?

  53. comment number 53 by: Judy

    Kos is the very thing they pretend to hate in others. These are not “progressives” at all. These are the communists and socialists who keep trying to take over the Democratic party. They also took over the word “progressive” but they are liberal-fascists no better than the extreme right fascsim they rail against. Please don’t judge us all this way. They are the mirror image of the qualities they say they despise. They are also pretty damned “totalitarian” themselves. Most Democrats don’t even want to go near them.

  54. comment number 54 by: Jeffraham Prestonian

    Judy. Where did you get those ’shrooms? Don’t hold out, nao.
    .

  55. comment number 55 by: Miriam Feldstein Case

    The comments about the death of Tony Snow are just unbelievable. How would you feel if people wanted you or your family to suffer? The language you use is so immature. As a very brilliant man once said: “Profanity is the attempt to express feeble ideas forcibly!”
    Tony Snow was a gentleman, a man of ideals, family, and a love for this country, which with its problems, is still the finest country in the world. Many people lose their lives, each year, trying to come to this land which was foreordained, before the earth was created, to be a land of liberty, and the New Jerusalem.

  56. comment number 56 by: Jeffraham Prestonian

    Miriam Feldstein Case — The Sane Commenter, here!

  57. comment number 57 by: be nice next time

    [edited because, this guy wasn't much intelligent]

  58. comment number 58 by: be nice next time

    than….Than!


  59. [...] the United States would boycott an event hosted by the largest cable news channel in the nation and then attend an event hosted by an organization that rejoiced in the death of Tony Snow in the most graphic, despicable ways [...]


  60. [...] the United States would boycott an event hosted by the largest cable news channel in the nation and then attend an event hosted by an organization that rejoiced in the death of Tony Snow in the most graphic, despicable ways [...]

Leave a Reply

Name

Mail (never published)

Website