Ayers is radical, bombs or not
October 15th, 2008 . by NedYes, Barack Obama was eight years old when Bill Ayers was an active, homeland terrorist, but Obama’s affiliations as an adult are un- and anti-American to a disturbing degree. Jeremiah Wright and Bill Ayers and Michelle Obama view America differently than the average American.On education, on private property, on race . . . these folks are radical, and Obama is notably comfortable with their views.
Which brings me to this interesting Chicago Tribune article about unrepentant domestic terrorist Bill Ayers:
“Ayers’ office door is decorated with pictures of Mumia Abu-Jamal, Che Guevara and Malcolm X. It is also home to pictures of children, bills of rights for students and parents, and a rainbow-hued greeting card advising ‘How to Be Really Alive.’ A place of prominence is given to a New Yorker cartoon of a man interviewing for a job. The interviewer says, ‘I’m trying to find a way to balance your strengths against your felonies.’”
Ayers is almost a Lefty cliche . . . people need to know that Obama’s mainstream-ish rhetoric while running for President is “just words, just speeches.”
More Ayers!
.
I said, “on private property,” by which I mean “Obama pals around with socialists” and advocates socialist policies.
Obama’s radical associations definitely bear on his economic theories. Just what we need: bigger government, wealth redistribution, socio-economic engineering.
I said, “on private property,” by which I mean “Obama pals around with socialists” and advocates socialist policies.
Who cares what you said? JUST KEEP SAYING IT!
Obama’s radical associations definitely bear on his economic theories. Just what we need: bigger government, wealth redistribution, socio-economic engineering.
We’ve had that since Reagan, just in a direction that helps the few, rather than the many.
.
Yep, I will keep saying it, and thankfully Obama won’t be able to rely on “super delegates” to get him over the top. Sluggish economy, “controversial” war, eight years out of power, gee, even a Democrat with three and a half months in the U.S. Senate could win this election.
And I’m eager to hear you try and explain how Reagan’s policies were “socialist.”
Yep, I will keep saying it
Please do!
And I’m eager to hear you try and explain how Reagan’s policies were “socialist.”
Income redistribution upward. On steroids under King Bush.
.
Here’s a good read.
Income redistribution upward. On steroids under King Bush.
Like I said, “try and explain” . . . I’ve seen the bumper stickers.
JP is high on cat litter again.
Since William cut and run, he’s sort of lost.
But, there’s always the welcoming of surrogate daddy Atrios, eh, JP?